As far as jobs go, I’ve been slumming it the past year working as an office manager/ paralegal for a small law office in Dupont Circle. I work 30 hours a week and my commute is a seven-minute walk, so I’ve been spoiled in some respects. I’ve learned the ins and outs of bankruptcy law, and could help you file a Chapter 7 or 13 in Virginia, DC, or Maryland at a fraction of what an attorney would charge (and I have done this part time here and there). This job has been rewarding some ways, but it hasn’t allowed me to express myself creatively, so in my spare time, while this site has been collecting cobwebs, I’ve been delving deep into digital photography, creating the below sample of “message photos” (honestly I’m not sure what you would call them. They aren’t memes.)
My personal life: not gonna go there. But unless I get a new job soon, I’m going to be forced to trade the “bright lights big city” of D.C. for the “aw shucks” southern charm of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in which case I should start practicing my “straight voice” now. Living in D.C. has been comfortable in the sense that one forgets how much energy it takes to have that straight act routine up and running all the time. It’s like a computer’s resources being eaten up by antivirus always humming in the background, only mine looks for homophobia instead of malware, and my shield is the affectation of a non-gay voice — lower-baritone, emotion-free, stern and professional. But I probably sounds like Rishard Simmons all the same.
The correlation between popularity and quality is tenuous at best. How often have excellent products died in the marketplace, while competing products of lesser quality have succeeded (I’m thinking Betamax, Kodak, and TiVo, to name a few)? How often, too, have movie stars achieved enormous popular success despite possessing little in the way of acting ability (my apologies to Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone)?
Popularity isn’t just a poor analog for quality, but as a goal it is notoriously difficult to achieve. Striving for it is a fool’s errand, as the public’s approval has as much to do with luck as any other factor. Better to strive for excellence, and let The Universe figure the rest out.
Most adults want to age in place; that is, grow older without the need to move from their home or community. As driving becomes a challenge, though, seniors can feel dependent upon others, or isolated and cut off from their friends or public services. Communities that have strong public transit systems and walkable amenities are increasingly attractive to seniors for the independence they instill. These places — like Washington D.C.’s Dupont Circle, shown above — are also associated with high housing costs, however, illuminating the pressing need in the U.S. for more transit, and more connected communities, as the Boomer generation ages.
[By Paul Goddin for Mobility Lab]
American cities are adding bus and bike lanes, implementing bikeshare systems, and creating public plazas and miniature parks at a rapid pace.
Urban streets, long the domain of automobiles, are increasingly being reclaimed by and for the people, a change that amounts to the biggest transportation innovation in recent years, according to a new report by TransitCenter.
“A People’s History of Recent Transportation Innovation” details how strong alignment among local civic organizations, city leadership, and transportation agencies has yielded enduring changes in regional transportation systems.
[By Paul Goddin for Mobility Lab. Edited for this site.]
With public-transit use riding a 58-year high of 10.8 billion trips last year, it only makes sense to ask: why? Technology may be partially responsible for public transit’s record ridership, but probably not in the way you think.
As smartphones and other electronic devices have skyrocketed in popularity, more people are becoming dependent on them (much to the chagrin of some psychologists). These technology-dependent commuters want to to remain engaged with their devices at all times, and more of them are choosing public transit for the ease at which they can do so while riding the bus or train.
A new study by DePaul University’s Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development finds that the most avid users of mobile devices may be boosting Chicago’s transit ridership numbers, and there is reason to believe this trend is occurring in other metropolitan areas. Apple, Google, and Amazon aren’t just changing the way we work, communicate, and socialize, but are also influencing our transportation choices as well.